Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Olbermann’s Special Comment
ConspiracyResearch.org > NWO Research > Politics, Government and Warfare > Corruption
Episteme
Olbermann’s Special Comment:
It is not the Democrats whose inaction in the face of the enemy you fear
October 5th, 2006 - MSNBC



Video - WMV
Video - QuickTime

Google Video (mirror) (mirror) (mirror)

Keith Olbermann: And lastly tonight, a Special Comment, about — lying. While the leadership in Congress has self-destructed over the revelations of an unmatched, and unrelieved, march through a cesspool… While the leadership inside the White House has self-destructed over the revelations of a book with a glowing red cover…

The President of the United States — unbowed, undeterred, and unconnected to reality — has continued his extraordinary trek through our country rooting out the enemies of freedom: The Democrats.

Full Transcript here.

More:

Keith Olbermann blasts Bush at Ground Zero 2006 (mirror) (mirror)
Olbermann's Special Comment regarding the Clinton Interview

More Keith Olberman Clips: http://www.crooksandliars.com/category/countdownkeith-olbermann/

This guy is really on the ball at the moment... happy.gif

Olbermann: “Why does habeas corpus hate America”
http://prisonplanet.com/articles/October20...06Olbermann.htm
http://www.crooksandliars.com/2006/10/10/o...s-hate-america/
Crooks And Liars | October 11 2006
QUOTE
Keith did a great report tonight on what the recently passed Military Commissions Act of 2006 means to America and our Constitution.

Watch here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2UntkKtyUKk

This story has been buried by Foleygate, which is a crime in itself. I had the honor of hearing Daniel Ellsberg and John Siegenthaler Sr. speak last night and the key subject was journalism in today's political environment. We are one of the only countries in the world without an official secrets act, due in a large part to the uniqueness of our first amendment. Sadly this very bill puts us even closer to enacting such legislation and putting a muzzle on the media that would have prevented the extraordinary act of patriotism that Ellsberg exhibited, as well as those that followed in the entire Watergate scandal.
QUOTE
Transcript below:

Because the Mark Foley story began to break the night of September 28th, exploding the following day, many people may not have noticed a bill passed by the Senate that night.

Our third story on the Countdown tonight, the Military Commissions Act of 2006 and what it does to something called "habeas corpus."

And before we reduce the very term "habeas corpus" to something vaguely recalled as sounding kinda like the cornerstone of freedom, or maybe kinda like a character from "Harry Potter," we thought a Countdown Special Investigation was in order.

Congress passed The Military Commissions Act to give Mr. Bush the power to deal effectively with America's enemies — those who seek to harm this country.

And he has been very clear about who that is:

"…for people to leak that program, and for a newspaper to publish it does great harm to the United States of America."

So the president said it was urgent that Congress send him this bill as quickly as possible, not for the politics of next month's elections, but for America.

"The fact that we're discussing this program is helping the enemy."

Because time was of the essence–and to ensure that the 9/11 families would wait no longer–as soon as he got the bill, President Bush whipped out his pen and immediately signed a statement saying he looks forward to signing the actual law…eventually.

He hasn't signed it yet, almost two weeks later, because he has been swamped by a series of campaign swings at which he has made up quotes from unnamed Democratic leaders, and because when he is actually at work, he's been signing so many other important bills, such as:

The Credit Rating Agency Reform Act;

the Third Higher Education Extension Act;

ratification requests for extradition treaties with Malta, Estonia and Latvia;

his proclamation of German-American Day;

the Partners for Fish and Wildlife Act;

and his proclamation of Leif Erikson Day.

Still, getting the Military Commissions Act to the President so he could immediately mull it over for two weeks was so important, some members of Congress didn't even read the bill before voting on it. Thus, has some of its minutiae, escaped scrutiny.

One bit of trivia that caught our eye was the elimination of habeas corpus. which apparently used to be the right of anyone who's tossed in prison, to appear in court and say, "Hey, why am I in prison?"

Why does habeas corpus hate America…and how is it so bad for us?

Mr. Bush says it gets in the way of him doing his job.

[video clip]Bush: "…we cannot be able to tell the American people we're doing our full job unless we have the tools necessary to do so. And this legislation passed in the House yesterday is a part of making sure that we do have the capacity to protect you. Our most solemn job is the security of this country."

It may be solemn…

[video clip] Bush: "I do solemnly swear…"

But is that really his job? In this rarely seen footage, Mr. Bush is clearly heard describing a different job.

[video clip]…to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States..

Countdown has obtained a copy of this "Constitution of the United States."

And sources tell us it was originally snuck through the Constitutional Convention and state ratification in order to establish America's fundamental legal principles.

But this so-called Constitution is frustratingly vague about the right to trial. In fact, there's only one reference to habeas corpus at all. Quote: "The privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it."

But even Democrats who voted against the Military Commissions Act concede that it doesn't actually suspend habeas corpus.

[video clip] Leahy: The bill before the Senate would not merely suspend the great writ, the great writ of habeas corpus, it would eliminate it permanently.

And there is considerable debate whether the conditions for suspending habeas corpus, rebellion or invasion, have been met.

[video clip] Leahy: conditions for suspending habeas corpus have not been met.

[video clip] Kerry: We're not in a rebellion, nor are we being invaded.

[video clip] Specter: We do not have a rebellion or an invasion.

[video clip] Biden: The United States is neither in a state of rebellion nor invasion.

[video clip] Byrd: We are not in the midst of a rebellion, and there is no invasion.

Countdown has learned that habeas corpus actually predates the "Constitution," meaning it's not just pre-September 11th thinking, it's also pre-July 4th thinking.

In those days, no one imagined that enemy combatants might one day attack Americans on native soil.

In fact, Countdown has obtained a partially redacted copy of a colonial "declaration" indicating that back then, "depriving us of Trial by Jury" was actually considered sufficient cause to start a War of Independence, based on the then-fashionable idea that "liberty" was an unalienable right.

Today, thanks to modern, post-9/11 thinking, those rights are now fully alienable.

The reality is, without habeas corpus, a lot of other rights lose their meaning.

But if you look at the actual Bill of Rights — the first ten amendments to that pesky Constitution — you'll see just how many remain.

Well, ok, Number One's gone.

If you're detained without trial, you lose your freedom of religion, speech, the press and assembly. And you can't petition the government for anything.

Number Two? While you're in prison, your right to keep and bear arms just may be infringed upon.

Even if you're in the NRA.

Three?

No forced sleepovers by soldiers at your house. OK. Three is unchanged.

Four?

You're definitely not secure against searches and seizures, with or without probable cause - and this isn't even limited to the guards.

Five… Grand juries and due process are obviously out.

Six. So are trials, let alone the right to counsel. Speedy trials? You want it when?

Seven. Hmmmm. I thought we covered "trials" and "juries" earlier.

Eight — So bail's kind of a moot point…

Nine: "Other" rights retained by the people. Well, if you can name them during your water-boarding, we'll consider them.

And Ten — powers not delegated to the United States federal government seem to have ended up there, anyway.

So as you can see, even without habeas corpus, at least one tenth of the Bill of Rights, I guess that's the Bill of "Right" now… remains virtually intact.

And we can rest easy knowing we will never, ever have to quarter soldiers in our homes… as long as the Third Amendment still stands strong.

The President can take care of that with a Signing Statement.
Episteme
Olbermann: “Rumsfeld Gave North Korea Nukes”
http://prisonplanet.com/articles/October20...006Rumsfeld.htm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P5GjW-dNfQ0
You Tube | October 11 2006
QUOTE
Keith Olbermann reports that company Rumsfeld was working for in 200 sold N. Korea the technology to build nuclear weapons.
Watch here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P5GjW-dNfQ0


Keith Olberman is on fire right now - long may it continue... here are a few more recent videos to check out on the state of the American Union and such:

Olberman Pays Tribute to "Stay the Course"
http://youtube.com/watch?v=1TwINABGqpg OR http://youtube.com/watch?v=-yb0HGMlUQg

Olbermann's Special Comment on GOP Fearmongering
http://youtube.com/watch?v=vLuolxalUtg OR http://youtube.com/watch?v=H4rwy12EH0w

Olbermann: "Beginning of the End of America" - Habeas Corpus Ended

http://youtube.com/watch?v=53ffOzJ-hH0 OR http://youtube.com/watch?v=Wqw6B4WqNcY
http://youtube.com/watch?v=0dK224Ppbmc OR http://youtube.com/watch?v=UFbj4OgZKUI

Keith Olberman on Bill Clinton Fox Interview

http://youtube.com/watch?v=M9g8fzNSOrY OR http://youtube.com/watch?v=donu6k9JuPA

Olberman tears Limbaugh a well-deserved one regarding his comments on Michael J Fox

http://youtube.com/watch?v=YpeMKCZDTZ4 OR http://youtube.com/watch?v=0o6yrdInw6s

If you like Keith Olberman's take on things check out Jack Cafferty too. (y).gif

Appologies for any repetition in this thread, I just thought this article was quite good:

Olbermann: The New Edward Murrow?
http://www.infowars.net/articles/October20...mann_Murrow.htm
Steve Watson / Infowars.net | October 24 2006


QUOTE
"Every act that denies or limits the freedom of the individual in this country costs us the. . . confidence of men and women who aspire to that freedom and independence of which we speak and for which our ancestors fought."

Edward Murrow - 1954
(Go watch "Good Night, Good Luck" - George Clooney Film)

It is no coincidence that Edward Murrow is the number one idol of Keith Olbermann. In these times of great upheaval there is really only one voice in the mainstream media that is speaking the truth and telling it the way it is.

The modern US media is owned and has always been owned by the corporations and big businesses that run America. So it is extremely rare when a figure of honesty and integrity in delivering the news rises to the top over corporate interests and censorship. One such figure was Edward Murrow, who always told it as it was and is most famed for his reports that helped lead to the censure of Senator Joseph McCarthy.

Whilst the Neocon lapdog apologists take pride in the fact that they take their orders directly from the White House, Olbermann, who tips his hat to Murrow by using his trademark "Good Night and Good Luck" tag line, continues to hit the ball out of the park with every special comment he makes.

While Olbermann is busy decrying the destruction of the Bill Of Rights and The Constitution, Bill O'Reilly is busy equating with terrorists those who question the President, then himself saying he would like to blow up bloggers with hand grenades. Hannity is busy telling Democrat voters to stay at home on election day then whining about how the media is conspiring to suppress Republican votes. And Limbaugh is spinning his own spin and calling us "Democrat kooks".



Keith Olbermann is a voice of reason, a shining beacon in a filthy media sea of corporate bootlickers. While the bootlickers without any consideration, and calling themselves "fair and balanced", associate any disagreement with the Neoconservative crime junta as being un-American, or somehow in league with "the terrorists", Keith Olbermann reports with refreshing integrity and speaks purely as a concerned American citizen, accountable to no political party or ideology.

Commenting on Olbermann's powerful special comment on the death of Habeas Corpus, Fox News exposers News Hounds commented:

"No, Olbermann was not speaking as a closet Democrat, as a Fox News commentator would speak as a closet Bush backer while claiming to be fair and balanced. Olbermann was not speaking as someone who coddles terrorists and wants them to "win." Olbermann was speaking as an American who values the freedoms and protections guaranteed by the Constitution and respected -- for the most part -- by previous presidents. And he did it with passion."

As Edward Murrow himself once said, it is a grave mistake to confuse dissent with disloyalty or deny the right of the individual to be wrong, unpopular, eccentric or unorthodox. The media has forgotten what it's role in society is supposed to be, or rather it's role has been irreversibly alerted by corporate acquisition and biased political interests.

Olbermann, appearing on C-SPAN, recently said: "There are people I know in the hierarchy of NBC, the company, and GE, the company, who do not like to see the current presidential administration criticized at all. ... There are people who I work for who would prefer, who would sleep much easier at night if this never happened. On the other hand, if they look at my ratings and my ratings are improved and there is criticism of the president of the United States, they're happy."

The cost of Olbermann's integrity and honesty has been personal attacks, both verbally and physically. Olbermann was recently sent hate letters packed with white powder. He called 911, and then went to the hospital so Doctors could confirm his health was not in danger.

The corporate controlled media proceeded to ATTACK Olbermann and laugh at him for reporting the incident and being concerned for his own well being. Imagine if this had happened to Bill O'Reilly, it would have been front page news for weeks, used endlessly as an excuse for the paranoid fueled rantings of Fox, which have recently included hyping up the deranged scribblings of two jokers in a chat room as huge terror threats.

We Commend Keith Olbermann and here display some of his recent groundbreaking comments:

Olbermann’s Special Comment on GOP Fearmongering

"The commercial, you have already seen, it is a distillation of everything this administration and the party in power have tried to do these last five years and six weeks."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xP0yus364Ek

Olbermann Exposes Nexus Of Politics And Terror


During a prime time segment on his MSNBC show, anchor Keith Olbermann presented ten clear examples where the Bush administration had issued terror alerts days after politically damaging revelations and questioned the credibility of each of the alleged plots' authenticity in light of astounding evidence to the contrary.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s_M2E-IQNkg

Olbermann: “Rumsfeld Gave North Korea Nukes”

Keith Olbermann reports that the company Rumsfeld was working for in 2000 sold North Korea the technology to build nuclear weapons.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P5GjW-dNfQ0

Olbermann: Bush Playing American Christians For Suckers

Keith reveals the Bush administration's truest innermost feelings of Christianity.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fbC3_VCNvnU

Olbermann: “Why does habeas corpus hate America”

Keith did a great report on what the recently passed Military Commissions Act of 2006 means to America and our Constitution.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2UntkKtyUKk

Olbermann video: Bush would sell America out to preserve GOP power

Keith Olbermann delivered a 'Special Comment' on the subject of lying, specifically that committed by members of the Administration, up to and including President Bush.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dxIZaoW8Brk
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rbDFOlpHqW4

Olbermann’s Latest Special Comment Targets Bush: “Have you no sense of decency, sir?”


Keith: "More over, Mr. Bush, you are accomplishing in part what Osama Bin Laden and others seek — a fearful American populace, easily manipulated, and willing to throw away any measure of restraint, any loyalty to our own ideals and freedoms, for the comforting illusion of safety."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aZRWILvaYSk

Olbermann: “The President of the United States owes this country an apology”

"An apology is this President’s only hope of regaining the slightest measure of confidence, of what has been, for nearly two years, a clear majority of his people."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=asVqqz7cFDw

Mr Olbermann, a long paused "tip of the hat" to you, Sir. wink.gif

Olbermann 'special comment' on White House campaign tactics
http://www.rawstory.com/news/2006/Video_Ol...White_1102.html
Mike Sheehan and David Edwards - RawStory.com - November 2, 2006
QUOTE
On MSNBC's Countdown, Keith Olbermann remarks in his trademark "Special Comment" on the absurdity of the Bush administration's attacks on Sen. John Kerry, under fire for remarks construed by Republicans as an insult to American troops.

Olbermann recalls the violent 1856 caning by Rep. Preston Brooks of South Carolina of the vociferous, anti-slavery Sen. Charles Sumner of Massachusetts, which disabled the senator for three years and was one of the memorable events leading up to the Civil War. In support, Brooks' constituents sent him new canes. Drawing a parallel, Olbermann remarks, "We almost wonder to whom President Bush will send the next 'new cane.'"

View here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kq7JUi1lQc4

(This thread may now best belong in the "Internet-Based Media" subforum due to the number of added video links.)

Keith delivers another powerful special comment. This time it is about elections.

"And so we look at the verdict in the trial of Saddam Hussein yesterday, and, with the very phrase 'October, or November, Surprise' now a part of our vernacular, and the chest-thumping coming from so many of the Republican campaigners today, each of us must wonder about the convenience of the timing of his conviction and sentencing. "

Watch here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jpYfakbrP6A

QUOTE
Full Transcript:

And finally tonight, a Special Comment about tomorrow's elections.

We are, as every generation, inseparable from our own time.

Thus is our perspective, inevitably that of the explorer looking into the wrong end of the telescope.

But even accounting for our myopia, it's hard to imagine there have been many elections more important than this one, certainly not in Non-Presidential years.

And so we look at the verdict in the trial of Saddam Hussein yesterday, and, with the very phrase "October, or November, Surprise" now a part of our vernacular, and the chest-thumping coming from so many of the Republican campaigners today, each of us must wonder about the convenience of the timing of his conviction and sentencing.

But let us give history and coincidence the benefit of the doubt — let's say it's just "happened" that way — and for a moment not look into the wrong end of the telescope.

Let's perceive instead the bigger picture:

Saddam Hussein, found guilty in an Iraqi court.

Who can argue against that?

He is officially, what the world always knew he was: a war criminal.

Mr. Bush, was this imprimatur, worth the cost of 2,832 American lives, and thousands more American lives yet to be lost?

Is the conviction of Saddam Hussein the reason you went to war in Iraq?

Or did you go to war in Iraq because of the Weapons of Mass Destruction that did not exist?

Or did you go to war in Iraq because of the connection between Iraq and Al Qaeda that did not exist?

Or did you go to war in Iraq to break the bonds of tyranny there — while installing the mechanisms of tyranny here?

Or did you go to war in Iraq because you felt the need to wreak vengeance against somebody — anybody?

Or did you go to war in Iraq to contain a rogue state which, months earlier, your own administration had declared had been fully contained by sanctions?

Or did you go to war in Iraq… to keep gas prices down?

How startling it was, Sir, to hear you introduce oil to your stump speeches over the weekend.

Not four years removed from the most dismissive, the most condescending, the most ridiculing denials of the very hint at, as Mr. Rumsfeld put it, this "nonsense"…

There you were, campaigning in Colorado, in Nebraska, in Florida, in Kansas — suddenly turning this 'unpatriotic idea'… into a platform plank.

"You can imagine a world in which these extremists and radicals got control of energy resources," you told us. "And then you can imagine them saying, 'We're going to pull a bunch of oil off the market to run your price of oil up unless you do the following."

Having frightened us, having bullied us, having lied to us, having ignored and re-written the constitution under our noses, having stayed the course, having denied you've stayed the course, having belittled us about "timelines" but instead extolled "benchmarks"…

You've now resorted, Sir, to this?

We must stay in Iraq to save the two-dollar gallon of gas?



Mr. President, there is no other conclusion we can draw as we go to the polls tomorrow.

Sir… you have been making this up as you went along.

This country was founded to prevent anybody from making it up as they went along.

Those vaunted founding fathers of ours have been so quoted-up, that they appear as marble statues: like the chiseled guards of China, or the faces on Mount Rushmore.

But in fact they were practical people and the thing they obviously feared most, was a government of men and not laws.

They provided the checks and balances for a reason.

No one man could run the government the way he saw fit — unless he, at the least, took into consideration what those he governed saw.

A House of Representatives would be the people's eyes.

A Senate would be the corrective force on that House.

An Executive would do the work… and hold the Constitution to his chest like his child.

A Supreme Court would oversee it all.

Checks and balances.

Where did that go, Mr. Bush?

And what price did we pay because we have let it go?

Saddam Hussein will get out of Iraq the same way 2,832 Americans have, and thousands more.

He'll get out faster than we will.

And if nothing changes tomorrow, you, Sir, will be out of the White House long before the rest of us can say… we are out of Iraq.

And whose fault is this?

Not truly yours. You took advantage of those of us who were afraid, and those of us who believed unity and nation took precedence over all else.

But we let you take that advantage.

And so we let you go to war in Iraq. To… oust Saddam. Or find non-existant Weapons. Or avenge 9/11. Or fight terrorists who only got there after we did. Or as cover to change the fabric of our Constitution. Or for lower prices at The Texaco. Or… ?

There are still a few hours left, before the polls open, sir, there are many rationalizations still untried.

And whatever your motives of the moment, we the people have, in true good faith and with the genuine patriotism of self-sacrifice (of which you have shown you know nothing)… we have let you go on…

Making it up.

As you went along.

Un-checked… and un-balanced.

Vote.


Olbermann on Decision 2006- Memorable Moments from MSNBC's US Mid-Term Elections Coverage:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=MwF7PjIxZWc

This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2010 Invision Power Services, Inc.