Interesting discussion...
QUOTE (Osgorth @ 28-June-2006 19:53)

What if... 9-11, the war on terror, the neocon agenda ....
....That is, they deliberately set out to destroy the USA, sacrifice it to the good cause and bring on anarchy and chaos to the world, crashing the economies at large and all this stuff we've been talking about for so long now... What better way to bring on the new world order that they have been pining for?
.....But did it ever cross your mind that WE are the tool for doing so? That they are sloppy on purpose, that some info leak out here and there willfully? To slowly let the people wake up to these issues, so that in the end the system will collapse because all secrets have been revealed.
Did anybody think along these lines before? ....
Yeah

...I too have considered the possibility of this

. There is evidence out there of past illuminati/intelligence services behaviour/ that deliberately seeks to stoke up rebel uprisings and rioting etc. Let's face it there is quite a lot of evidence now to show that much of the activities/orders of the US administration have not served to quash terrorism but specifically designed to ferment it and bring about retaliation. There is also evidence that they ARE deliberately trying to bring about the apocalypse (think someone else mentioned this above) either to bring about the return of the saviour or to bring about the conditions for the UN to be able to fly in like a superhero to our rescue (one world government - slave planet
.gif)
).
The notion that they are "sloppy on purpose" I'm not sure - only when it suits them (i.e. not all the time), order out of chaos - yes - but they can't let it get too out of hand, i.e. total anarchy. And there are many techniques for "managing" these factual leaks or untruths, whilst carrying or regardless behind the scenes.
Many politicians/illuminati front men/scapegoats (by this I mean whoever carries the can for a leak/lie/mistake/error) seem to favour the label of incompetence over being labelled as a liar (in the UK pick any resigning cabinet member over the last 5 years) "I forgot", "I wasn't aware/informed", "It was not clear at the time" OR they use a strategy of simple denial - "look at that shinny thing over there" , "henny penny the sky is falling", "la la la I can't hear you". (Lessons available from Rumsfeld, Scott Mclelland and Tony Snow $19.95/hr - lol).
I do think that government agencies do keep tracks on independent news outlets and underground conspiracy news networks etc. etc. and it does give them what they would see as valuable information about the reactions of some areas of the public, who don't engage with mainstream methods of information retrieval. Anyway, I'm beginning to ramble so better finish what I was thinking and summarise...
It makes me uncomfortable to think that people like us are being used as a tool to get the information out, because I just do not want to be devoting my time and energy to helping the tyrants/control freaks towards their goals.
I suppose at the end of the day we have to take ALL information with a pinch of salt to avoid falling into this trap. It is probably more important than ever, in doing what we do here to increasingly read between the lines, to realise how important it is to get multiple verifiable sources to back-up the facts but also that it is crucial to know the credibility of these sources in intimate detail. A source, be it a report or a person, it is important to know who funded that source, their motivations, their biases (political or otherwise) etc. Finally, I guess it is more important than ever with releases of "sensitive" information, on any subject, to know (or try to find out) the significance of it's timing and to compare this to similar past/historical info and releases. Only after considering all of the above can we truly see where a piece of information fits into the grand puzzle and we can help others and visitors here to see through the disinfo.
[What we/I/they do with the verified info is another question - if people have the truth they can make up their own minds and I would hope (maybe wrongly) that resistance in the form of all-out bloody rebellion and fighting (war) can be avoided.]
Those are some personal thoughts anyway, there are probably some of you who have a lot more experience of publishing and info verification than I.
For now I'm really interested in the Bilderberg saga and will probably be camped out in this area of the forum trying to get a handle on the scope of what they do and what they aspire to do. There seems to be good momentum on this story and they seem to be the link between the shadowy top tier elite and the governments and institutions which seem bent on controlling us. Some of the members are elected officials so there is the (remote) possibility of some accountability there. Getting some mainstream US and European press coverage on this would also be nice. Maybe you could help me out...
If you could stand in front of the Bilderberg group and ask them any questions you so desired - what would you ask them?