QUOTE
When an armored limousine is speeding on the down ramp, the front suspension is placed under enormous stress to keep the vehicle level, which causes a large and widening gap between the road surface and the body of the vehicle.

Steering will be practically non existent as the car careers downhill, the front suspension will lock at full extension, while the rear suspension, gas assisted and under extreme stress, will shoot the car upward, as the speeding and by then out of control vehicle loses contact with the road.
The car then crashes back down onto the roadway, and is shot upward into the roof of the tunnel with the momentum of the vehicle, as the now recharged suspension firstly absorbs the full weight of the vehicle, then launches it skyward.
The drivers judgment was clouded by alcohol, and it was bad driving that caused the vehicle to crash. No murder.
QUOTE
Feedback: ..Oh just one question, how did the suspension affect the cameras in the tunnel, and cut off the police radios in the area etc.
Who says the cameras in the tunnel were switched off, or that the police radios were immobilized, police testimony is notoriously fickle, and someone with an axe to grind, trying to build a case, need only solicit testimony from the Gendarmerie that the radios were down, maybe it is the norm in Paris at that time of the night, that police communications are difficult, and that traffic cameras are mostly un serviceable.
So both those random assertions are beat together, and pretty soon you have a story where you can cast slander and innuendo willy nilly, to the four winds with absolutely no physical evidence to back it up.
Clogging the news service outlets with this sort of mindless and ultimately frivolous nonsense keeps hard news off the headlines, it is no new thing nor is it confined to this one story.
QUOTE
However here ill intentioned people have taken the opportunity slander the Queen, and her son Prince Charles, estranged husband of the deceased Princess Diana, in a matter so sensitive to their sensibilities, as her tragic death in an automobile accident.
Forensic evidence is used to determine the cause of traffic accidents in most cases, French accident inspectors gave professional opinions at proceedings in France, which influenced the French Coroner’s decision that no warrants be issued regarding this death.
The latest slander doing the rounds is that MI6 somehow persuaded an Al Fayed employee to get full of liquor, then drive like a lunatic, until he crashed a three tonne armored limo into a reinforced concrete pillar in a freeway underpass, in a plot to kill a VIP guest of the boss’s son ..gimme a break.
QUOTE
Feedback: ..Frankly you must be an idiot if you even entertain the idea that cameras are switched off at night, or that a normally good service suddenly goes off just at the right time.
Do your own research without rose tinted spec about royalty, or with an unthinking belief that journalists do anything other than repeat what they are told.
I didn't notice royalty respecting my grandfather's sensibilities when he was sent to die in the trenches to maintain their turf wars.
Do your own research without rose tinted spec about royalty, or with an unthinking belief that journalists do anything other than repeat what they are told.
I didn't notice royalty respecting my grandfather's sensibilities when he was sent to die in the trenches to maintain their turf wars.

The fact that someone's grandfather like so many of his generation, enlisted under the colors and served in the lines, by no means give that person the right to assert that the CRE has in any way, avoided the sensibilities of her comrades in arms.
Surely no other person has attended more memorials, or laid more wreaths or accepted more flowers on behalf of the war dead, and on behalf of serving military personnel than has she as Commander of the Royal Engineers.
I would further suggest that that same warlike grand parent, would likely box the ears of any delinquent grandson who had the temerity to suggest otherwise, or to suggest it is a mater of idiocy to demand evidence in the face of groundless assertion.