QUOTE ("MT")
There was no trace of a plane in Pennsylvania on 911, despite continuing assertion that the Happy Schmooligans blasted Flight 93 out of the sky, plenty of paper strewn across the landscape and burn marks in the trees, but no plane.


A major passenger carrying jet does not fit into a hole...



Like the one in the picture where "they" say one crashed, and say that the absence of wreckage is because the plane burnt up, or evaporated, or buried itself.

QUOTE
They went to war and bombed and blasted Afghanistan cos they reckon some dood in that land caused a plane to go off course and eventually crash, cos a Jew passenger rallied the rest of the passengers, and hollerin "let's roll" attacked the hijackers… gimme a break!!

Resonates with the alleged Jew professor at VA Tech, when Cho was said to have killed thirty two people …he was a hero figure as well… so they say, seems that the same firm that cooked up 911, did the job at VA Tech as well.




Part of a jet engine recovered at the Shanksville site, looks identical to the jet rotor found at the Pentagon!!

QUOTE
Flight 93 was reported by 9 News landing in Cleveland Hopkins Airport, & confirmed by U.S. Airlines… "A Boeing 767 out of Boston, made an emergency landing Tuesday at Cleveland Hopkins International Airport, due to concerns that it may have a bomb aboard," said Mayor Michael R. White, he said the plane had been moved to a secure area of the airport, and was evacuated, United identified the plane as Flight 93, the airline did not say how many people were aboard the flight.


Roy Says: November 11th, 2008, ...A 100 ton 757 with 124′ wingspan and two 8 ton Rolls Royce turbofan engines WHICH ARE EACH 9 FEET IN DIAMETER and made partially of titanium did NOT hit that building ...Unbroken windows near the small entry hole, 14′ diameter on the Pentagon wall confirm this. WHY ISN”T THE MEDIA HELPING CLEAR THIS UP CONFUSION!!


Black box allegedly from Flight 93.

More wreckage from Shanksville !!

The truth is never gonna go away, "they" can BS as much as they like, but everyone who sees the Shanksville shots like the one above, know that a major plane don’t fit in that hole, so they better had come up with another story, in fact make that two stories, the second will be how they got the first one wrong.

QUOTE ("Bnglsfan")
From what I have seen, it looks like the plane did get shot down.


Ok, I am the judge and you have the pic from this story’s header... there is a capital trial underway, you are asked to tell the court just why you say, "it looks like a plane did get shot down."

Details of the plane are presented to the court, the landing trucks consist of hydraulic ram type assemblages and the wingspan is forty meters, the engines turbo fans are made from an alloy that melts only at very high temperatures, and does not burn at all, so what makes you say that you believe a plane crashed.

At this point, you are reminded that you are giving evidence in a case involving capital treason against the United States of America, and that you have agreed to appear as a witness, defending the assertion a plane crashed into that hole… similarly you are reminded that perjury in a capital case is a capital offense… Well Mr Bnglsfan.

The Pentagon


The Pentagon, only minutes after the strike... no sign of a plane at all!!

An engine rotor recovered at the Pentagon.

Now ask yourselves if the nose cone highlighted in the small pic, which is the first frame in the only officially released footage of the Pentagon strike...



resembles the nose of the cruiser in this pic



...I reckon it does!!


This is a shot of an aerial launch of a Russian CH 55 cruise missile, from a TU 160 aircraft.

Now we must consider whether the plane climbing above the Pentagon, similarly launched the missile that hit that building!!



It seems it did!!



A cruise missile on the test range... looks exactly like the Pentagon strike!!

http://au.youtube.com/watch?v=cUmr9dFbf2c# 911 Commission member says missile strike, then quickly corrects himself!!