These are missing?

http://www.conspiracyresearch.org/forums/i...amp;#entry44168

http://www.conspiracyresearch.org/forums/i...showtopic=46452

Both of these are gone. I have producecd new material and I was wondering if it is ok to post it here on ConspiracyResearch.org? I don't want to waste your or my time. This is my new video. Can I post this in your forum?


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nLwZM4XaGX8


Exodus Uncovered as a Climatic Switch NEW VIDEO FROM WWW.H2ONE2.COM



H2onE2, Glacial Respiration, Conceptual Ring of Ice, The End of Linear Western Religion,



Emancipates, Exodus, as a survival manifesto. This is an allegory, placed out of timed historical reference, to hide, a 10,000 year old, account of survival, during the great flood, specifically, transition from glacial winter to global summer. Documents the Plight, the journey and dangers, experienced at a climate collapse, termed, Glacial Respiration,. Uncovering environmental change from Exodus, requires the assumption that the great flood of Noah, creation and Moses parting of the Red Sea are, the same event. Different stories, absorbed by the Jews, adopted, and assimilated into their scripture.

The posts you refer to were supressed because it seemed appropriate to do so at the time. On the one hand, you were a new member back then and those early posts came across very much as thinly disguised advertisments for your video series, which has to be guarded against, if the forum is to avoid degenerating into a collection of Viagra ads and the like! It's a fine line to police. Not only that, but one of the two posts in particular was very poorly formatted. IIRC you had about 10 lines of space between each line of text which made it very annoying to read as it was a lengthy post. If you'll permit me to say so, quite a few of your posts could be formatted a little better with only a few extra seconds of effort, but it was the extreme formatting, more than the content as such, that provoked the reaction in that particular instance, coupled with your repeated use of the phrase "professional geologist", which we as moderators have no way to validate. I hope you can appreciate our position.

Like I say, overall, it was a tough call to make and occasionally busy people can make mistakes, but on balance, a decision was taken to pull those two and see what happened next. Since then your submissions have improved and your subsequent posts have not been a cause for concern. They've also been interesting too - and I've enjoyed the way you've fleshed out your position and improved on the integrity of your work over time. Anyway, perhaps it would have been better to have sent you a PM to explain the decision back then and I apologize for the fact that that didn't happen, but you have to understand that difficult decisions have to be made 'on the hoof' sometimes to preserve the 'tone' of the board. Having said all that, I'd like to finish by stressing that you are more than welcome to continue post here and I've even no objection to you re-posting the other two, bearing in mind what I've pointed out here. It's all a matter of degree.

Hope that clarifies things without me sounding too much like a pompous old fart or an agent of the dark side!

Peace.

I understand, what I am looking for on this forum is to find open minded people to review my book and write a quick review. Anyone who reads the book will know I am a real geologist and a very good one. Maybe a moderator could do a book review and evaluate the work in its entirety and for its validity? Are you interested?

I'm glad we clarified that. Thx for taking the time to understand.

Regarding your book review; I'd like to, because I'm always up for learning new things and it's good for me to have a focus occasionally, but in fairness to you I'm probably not best placed to do the job as I know next to nothing about geology. My background is social science based (esp psychology, politics and industrial relations) along with a shovelful of electronics, but that said, in the absence of a better qualified volunteer, if you were to send me a copy I'd be more than happy to review it to the best of my ability. I have plenty of time, but I barely have enough money to eat these days so it'd need to be a freebie!

While we're chatting, I'd like to ask for your opinion an unrelated question.

I read a while ago some crazy post on the 'net that said the sun had moved and that it was rising and setting in an unusual place. I then saw another and another, so one morning I decided to watch the sun rise from a spot I recall watching it rise in my youth and sure enough, it did seem different, ie it rose about 10 degrees more south-easterly than I remembered. Also, there a beach near here where my step-father took a cine film of the sunset many years ago and I remember it because the sun set slap-bang in the middle of the bay, but it isn't any more, it's off to one side at roughly the same time of year.

Intrigued, I made myself a compass from magnet, a pin, a bowl of water and a cork (just like we were taught in school, lol): and it was because of this childhood experience that I distinctly remember knowing where north was when I was standing in a particular spot, so I drove out there and lo and behold, that's moved too. North is now roughly where NNW would have been thirty years ago: and this is something I've since confirmed elsewhere on the 'net as being accepted science.

But then, just as I was getting used to the idea, I read a post somewhere which said basically, "Nonsense. Go and look at an old sundial and you'll find it still works", so I did - and it does.



The point is, I don't get it H2onE2. I don't understand how all three things can be true simultaneously and yet it appears to be the case. Can you help me understand what's really going on?

I will send you a free digital copy of the H2onE2 book for review where do I send it? I am H2onE2 (at) hotmail you could email me. Having no geology exposure is the exact person I am looking for. I spent four years editing the work so people without a science degree could understand the material. And, I went through great pains giving examples for ever function so that anyone could understand the function, forces and mechanisms involved. As far as the psychology goes the book covers a great deal of this topic. I would even say it is my favorite part because it is completely mentally explosive.


As far as your science question goes all are explained in the book. Although the sun never moves, earth does. And, earth moves in three different ways over the course of different time periods. These earth movements are what the Mayan created their 100,000 year calendar with.

This site has some good pictures which explain things better.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milankovitch_cycles




1 Orbital shape (eccentricity)- loosely combine into a 100,000-year cycle (variation of −0.03 to +0.02)

2 Axial tilt (obliquity) - approximately 41,000 years

3 Precession (wobble) -roughly 26,000 years

What I think you are noticing are primarily seasonal changes. Are you back at the same spot at the same time in the year or date?


As far as the magnet goes earth also experiences a magnetic drift. Every year a GPS devise should be re-calibrated to adjust the drift. Depending on where you are standing horizontally on earth’s surface the drift could be large or small. I would say between .25 to 5 degrees not what your experiment produced.

Thanks for the info.

I tend to think the beach sunset was viewed in the same month, but it is a thirty year old memory so I could be mistaken. What's more, it would appear that my home-made compass isn't necessarily as accurate as I assumed it would be. I tried to repeat the experiment to show a friend my "discovery" the other day and the damned thing kept pointing more or less due west and making me look like an idiot in spite of my best efforts to make it "work", so next time I'm in town I'm going to make a point of tracking down a real compass to find out what's really going on. Last time I owned a real one it came with my shoes back in the early 70's! Clarks Commandos I think they were called & until you lost the compass (on about the third day) they were great fun.

Making a compass is usally not the best way to go. When I do field geology work I carry two compasses just to double check myself and the direction.