Last Wednesday (27th Feb), a number of Brits held a peaceful demo at the Houses of Parliament organised by the iwantareferendum.co.uk group. Their aim was to register protest about the passage of the new EU treaty through the domestic legal process. Here's how the BBC reported the event (although most outlets didn't bother).


On any other day, the news of this protest might have made the front page (well maybe). On this day though, the story struggled to get any coverage at all apart from the article above. Why? Because THIS happened at the same time:


The protest began at 9.30am and completely overshadowed the EU protest going on below for the rest of the day. It was all over the news. Coincidence? Hardly. The following day we were told this:


So, an insider assists the five climate change/third runway protestors with their eye-catching banners on to the roof. How convenient.

In one sense, that's all there is to it, but let's summarize and see what we get.

The EU protest: Stated it's case, released some of the pent up frustration of the protestors and passed off without a ripple in the wider media, thus presenting no real threat whatsoever to the passage of the billl through parliament. The illegal EU occupation of our country continues unabated.

The Climate change/third runway protest: This is far more interesting than it seems on the surface. It's a hotly contentious point, but for me, both issue(s) are entirely bogus. The runway issue is a simple enough dialectic. Those who repeat the mantra of trade and cheap flights want it regardless and those who have to live under the toxic mess don't, but most of all, it's patently obvious that it's going to happen regardless - which makes it a pointless diversion. The climate change aspect is slightly more sophisticated; something of a subliminal attack really. You see, it wasn't really the protestors that turned it into a climate change protest, it was the media. Take a look at this headline in the Telegraph and compare it with the Independent article headline above to confirm this.

Again, we're looking at another dialectic being reinforced - a cleavage between those who believe in the climate change nonsense and those who don't. For those who swallow it, allow me to offer this quote. I've used it before but if you are a climate change disciple you really need to read it over and over again until you understand it.

QUOTE

"In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine, and the like would fit the bill. In their totality and in their interactions these phenomena do constitute a common threat which demands the solidarity of all peoples. But in designating them as the enemy, we fall into the trap about which we have already warned, namely mistaking symptoms for causes. All these dangers are caused by human intervention and it is only through changed attitudes and behaviour that they can be overcome. The real enemy, then, is humanity itself."
The First Global Revolution, by Alexander King and Bertrand Schneider for the Executive Committee of the Club of Rome. 1991

The quote leads me on to my major point, which is this. Look at these two events from the point of view of the elite, rather than the players themselves (for believe me, the players were nothing more than pawns in this).

1. The EU protest - nicely silenced, not with brute force or oppression to scare people and confirm the existence of tyranny, but with a clever little psy-op running alongside to render it impotent. The participants probably feel they had their say and all went home happy, while most of the rest of us didn't hear about it, thus reinforcing the perception that no-one really seems very bothered about this EU business so it must be OK. 1-0 to the elites.

2. The Climate change protest - raised awareness and reinforced the non-specific paranoia and complicity induced by the the bogus climate change issue. More sheep on side as a result of apparent peer pressure. Another nice example of PR/mind-control effected to serve the longer term UN agenda. (Agenda 21). 2-0 to the elites

3. The runway protest - a total waste of time as I've explained. A false dialectic to misdirect individual attention and energies on to a non-issue. 3-0 to the elites

4. The security issue - on day one much of the public "debate" (staged as always) often focussed on the apparent revelation that any old Tom, Dick or Harry could just wander up to the roof o the Parliament building. Anyone who's been there knows categorically that this is nonsense and yet the media wasted hours waffling about this non-issue, thereby reinforcing the idea that there's a need for even tighter security measures in our society, even though in truth, this whole thing was a litany of deception and insider knowledge. Even the police managed to take most of the day to get the protesters down - after all, they had to wait until those troublesome EU protestors had moved on right? 4-0 and game to the elites. We're being trounced folks.

In my opinion, this was a TOTALLY staged event. It involved the members of Plane Crazy (or Plane Stupid, depending on which article you read), but it also involved certain parliamentary officials, the police, the media coverage on the day and even the I Want A Referendum group. Of course I can't prove that beyond all reasonable doubt, but I don't need to.

The real message of this post is that we all need to become much more aware of the methods used to shape and mislead the public consciousness in order that we may counteract them more effectively.