Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Us Urges Scientists To Block Out Sun
ConspiracyResearch.org > NWO Research > Science, Technology and Health > En-Mod
Solve et Coagula
It seems "their" ongoing chemtrails didnt work out neatly, hmm!?!?! When do human beings realize/accept that we're part of Nature itself, to see the entire Cosmos as a lovely, caring Being where everything is in its perfect place for good reason, and when are we humble enough to start benefiting from these eternal forces...

US Urges Scientists To Block Out Sun

David Adam and Liz Minchin
January 29, 2007

THE US wants the world's scientists to develop technology to block sunlight as a last-ditch way to halt global warming.

It says research into techniques such as giant mirrors in space or reflective dust pumped into the atmosphere would be "important insurance" against rising emissions, and has lobbied for such a strategy to be recommended by a UN report on climate change, the first part of which is due out on Friday).

The US has also attempted to steer the UN report, prepared by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), away from conclusions that would support a new worldwide climate treaty based on binding targets to reduce emissions. It has demanded a draft of the report be changed to emphasise the benefits of voluntary agreements and to include criticisms of the Kyoto Protocol, which the US opposes.

The final report, written by experts from across the world, will underpin international negotiations to devise an emissions treaty to succeed Kyoto, the first phase of which expires in 2012. World governments were given a draft of the report last year and invited to comment.

The US response says the idea of interfering with sunlight should be included in the summary for policymakers, the prominent chapter at the front of each panel report. It says: "Modifying solar radiance may be an important strategy if mitigation of emissions fails. Doing the R&D to estimate the consequences of applying such a strategy is important insurance that should be taken out. This is a very important possibility that should be considered."

Scientists have previously estimated that reflecting less than 1 per cent of sunlight back into space could compensate for the warming generated by all greenhouse gases emitted since the industrial revolution. Possible techniques include putting a giant screen into orbit, thousands of tiny, shiny balloons, or microscopic sulfate droplets pumped into the high atmosphere to mimic the cooling effects of a volcanic eruption. The IPCC draft said such ideas were "speculative, uncosted and with potential unknown side-effects".

The US submission complains the draft report is "Kyoto-centric" and it wants to include the work of economists who have reported "the degree to which the Kyoto framework is found wanting".

It also complains that overall "the report tends to overstate or focus on the negative effects of climate change". It also wants more emphasis on responsibilities of the developing world.

But Professor Stephen Schneider, a climate consultant to the US government for more than 30 years and a key figure in the panel process for more than a decade, says the world is "playing Russian roulette" with its future by responding too slowly to climate change.

The panel's draft report shows projections for average global temperature rise from 1990 to 2100 will expand slightly, with a new range of one to 6.3 degrees. The 2001 report's range was 1.4 to 5.8 degrees.

Professor Schneider said he was concerned the increase was more likely to be three degrees or higher, with a 10 per cent chance of a six-degree rise by the end of the century.

"Hell, we buy fire insurance based on a 1 per cent chance," he said. "If we're going to be risk averse … we cannot dismiss the possibility of potentially catastrophic outliers and that includes Greenland and West Antarctica [ice sheets breaking up], massive species extinctions, intensified hurricanes and all those things. "There's at least a 10 per cent chance of that. And that to me for a society is too high a risk … My value judgement when you're talking about planetary life support systems is that 10 per cent, my God, that's Russian roulette with a Luger."

http://www.smh.com.au/news/environment/us-...9919213362.html
MaJik
Thats the interesting thing about us humans, absolute power corrupts absolutely. We humans have been on top of the food chain for a long time and we have really taken advantage. Unfortunately for us no one can outrun nature
F6Juicer
Dr Bill Deagle a NWO former insider, worked on many MANY highly classified above-government projects. 95% of those in the NSA who are involved in the chem-trail program think they are spraying to block out the sun, and are being told its a good thing for the public because the sun is 'heating up.' Only the very few top level NSA guys know the real reason that chem-trails are being sprayed, and that is - it is a de-population program.

Let me explain something that everyone misses. Everything is 'hidden in plain site.' That is a very effective method to make you think that is not what their really up to. Heres an example of how it works, take a UN feeding mission in Africa. - Seems like a good thing doesn't it?? Trying to help and feed displaced individuals. Did you know that in many cases they are actually depopulation programs at work. Yes I am serious - they are actually a eugenics program. Google "Refugee Camp Death Rates" and study it - you will find that 30% of those in the camps will die in 1 year. How'd they Do that (kinda like the show) is this, the people (even though the camp is in the middle of the desert) are overpacked by DESIGN. When they are deliverately that crowded into a small area they easily spread dyptheria, and many other dangerous ailments (not to mention what is put into their 'vaccines') They are told they are put into such a small foot print for their own good.

You see the truth is always the opposite of what we think it is. America is not going to invade Iran so the oil flows, NO! They are going to invade Iran so the Oil DOES NOT flow. This way they can get it to $5/gallon. Before the invasion of Iraq gasoline was 80 cents a gallon, 6 Months after the invasion it was $1.50

If you would like to learn some incredibly informed MP3s check out Dr Bill Deagle at the Granada Forum (if you can find it) or goto www.nutrimedical.com
Cypher
I saw a copy of this available just yesterday, from a new tracker at http://www.anomalicresearch.com:7000.
I've not been able to download the file, as yet, but hope it will come down in time.

Although the tracker's only a few days old, it's bound to take off with the seemingly high quality of information that's on there already, if only the teething problems can be rectified. Well worth a look.

Mairi
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2010 Invision Power Services, Inc.